Chemical Immobilization for Leopards
The Leopard (Panthera pardus) is the most widely distributed large wild cat, and occupies a broad variety of habitats, ranging from rainforests to deserts and from the fringes of urban areas to remote mountain ranges.1 The Indian subspecies, Pantherapardus fusca, is found all across India, except for desert areas and above the timberline in the Himalayas. Despite being protected under India’s Wildlife Protection Act of 1972, it is still threatened due to poaching.2
The severe threat of extinction of wildlife species has alarmed wildlife biologists and conservationists for several decades. Many conservation efforts are being attempted focusing on wild animals and their ecosystems. These conservation and management programs often rely on methodologies (e.g., radio-collaring, procurement of biomedical samples for research purposes, translocation of the animals to another area, management purposes in captivity) that require the handling of animals.
Methods of Restraint: Which is Best?
Restraint is often required in the manipulation and handling procedures performed on wild animals. This can include routine veterinary care, surgical intervention, vaccination, hormonal implantation or sterilization, assisted reproductive techniques, blood collection for genetic health analysis or for conservation and management purposes. Thus, the capture and handling of wild animals plays an important role in wildlife conservation and management.
Although physical restraint is straightforward in theory and usually poses minimal risk to animals, it has several limitations and many times it is impractical. In such cases, chemical restraint is the most reliable alternative to restraining wildlife species when required; as such, it has become a valuable tool in wildlife conservation research and management. Great care must be taken when anaesthetizing wildlife species to keep within the safety margin of anesthetics, whether employing neuromuscular blockers, single drugs or drug combinations.
With the advancement of the last few decades, chemical restraint of zoo and wildlife species has improved with safer and efficient drugs, portable monitoring equipment, and precise methods of drug delivery. Modern immobilizing protocols have drastically reduced side-effects of drugs and the attendant causalities. Furthermore, the use of antagonists for anesthetic agents helps to avoid undesirable and harmful effects of drugs, and for the speedy recovery of highly valuable wildlife species. In recent years, chemical restraint has been successfully employed by wildlife veterinarians to treat or relocate animals in captivity as well as in the wild. Advanced procedures have become increasingly more popular and are gradually being adopted by zoos around the world for the safer handling of wild animals. Modern capture methods call for a relatively high degree of expertise and experience, as well as basic knowledge of anatomy, physiology and behavior of the animals to be captured. Unfortunately, many zoo veterinarians and wildlife managers lack such expertise and experience. The ultimate success of the wildlife capture, transport and re-establishment of animals is determined not merely by the success in capture of the animals but more often evaluated in terms of how the animals are handled, transported and kept after capture and whether they adapt and breed successfully in their new environment.2
Chemical Restraint for Wild and Captive Leopards
Chemical restraint is a safe and effective capture method when applied correctly and with the proper precautions. It is advantageous over physical capture because it allows examining and treating sick and injured animals, or animals caught in poachers’ snares or traps. Chemical restraint enables the restraint of aggressive animals within a group, and the equipment required for chemical restraint is easily transported in the field.
A variety of drugs have been used for chemical restraint of zoo and wild animals, including leopards. While there is no “perfect” drug or an anesthetic that will suit all wild species, an ideal drug should have the following properties:
- Readily available
- Economical
- Readily soluble in water
- Stable in solution with long shelf life
- High therapeutic index
- Potent (required dose delivered in small volume)
- Fast-acting
- Smooth onset of induction
- Minimum excitement
- Non-irritating upon administration via IV or IM routes
- Good muscle relaxation
- Minimum depression of physiological variables (heart rate, breathing)
- Sufficient analgesia at subanesthetic doses
- Retention of reflexes such as swallowing
- Effective antidote (reversal agent) with minimal side effects
- Rapid degradation to inactive, non-toxic metabolites
- Safe to use in pregnant animals
- Safe for humans upon accidental exposure
Drugs for the Chemical Immobilization of Leopards
In the immobilization of wild leopards, anesthetic drugs are generally administered by remote darting systems. Pole syringes may be used to inject animals that are in captivity, or in close proximity (such as animals in squeeze cages, crates or crush passageways). Drugs can also be injected with ordinary syringes after the animals have been captured in nets or by other mechanical means.1
The preferred sites of darting in the leopard are the shoulder and hindquarters. The muscles of the shoulder, the biceps and triceps, are among the best places for remote injection in ungulates. It is better to avoid the upper part of the shoulder because the dart needle may become embedded in the cartilage or scapula. In light-muscled animals, the hindquarters are usually a preferable site for darting.
Nielsen’s Chemical Immobilization of Wild and Exotic Animals recommends that wild leopards be trapped in a cage or with staked bait, after which they may be remotely darted. Recommended drugs for the immobilization of leopards include:
- Ketamine in doses of 5 to 20 mg/kg, with or without 0.5 to 4 mg/kg of xylazine,
- Telazol® in doses of 1.5 to 40 mg/kg, or
- Medetomidine in doses of 0.04 to 0.10 mg.kg with 2 to 3.5 mg/kg of ketamine.3
These drugs and dosages are largely supported by other researchers and available sedation protocols.
Uncontrolled recoveries due to prolonged sedation are a serious concern in wildlife research, since the sedated free-ranging animals can be easily injured (or preyed upon, in the case of prey animals). It is therefore important to determine a suitable antagonist for the speedy recovery of anaesthetized leopards. α-2 adrenergic antagonists such as yohimbine, tolazoline and atipamezole have been used effectively in leopards for antagonizing the anesthetic effects of ketamine, xylazine and medetomidine.4
1Kitchener, A. (1991): The natural history of the wild cats. Christopher Helm, A. & C. Black, London. Pp.200.
2Deka, Karabi & Athreya, Vidya & Odden, Morten & Linnell, John. (2012). Chemical immobilization of leopard Panthera Pardus in the wild for collaring in maharashtra, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. 109.
3Nielsen, L. Chemical Immobilization of Wild and Exotic Animals. (1999) Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press.
4Kreeger, T. (1996): Handbook of Wildlife Chemical Immobilization. Pp. 175.
About NexGen Pharmaceuticals
NexGen Pharmaceuticals is an industry-leading veterinary compounding pharmacy, offering sterile and non-sterile compounding services nationwide. Unlike other veterinary compounding pharmacies, NexGen focuses on drugs that are difficult to find or are no longer available due to manufacturer discontinuance or have yet to be offered commercially for veterinary applications, but which still serve a critical need for our customers. We also specialize in wildlife pharmaceuticals, including sedatives and their antagonists, offering many unique options to serve a wide array of zoo animal and wildlife immobilization and anesthesia requirements.
Our pharmacists are also encouraged to develop strong working relationships with our veterinarians in order to better care for veterinary patients. Such relationships foster an ever-increasing knowledge base upon which pharmacists and veterinarians can draw, making both significantly more effective in their professional roles.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this blog post is general in nature and is intended for use as an informational aid. It does not cover all possible uses, actions, precautions, side effects, or interactions of the medications shown, nor is the information intended as medical advice or diagnosis for individual health problems or for making an evaluation as to the risks and benefits of using a particular medication. You should consult your veterinarian about diagnosis and treatment of any health problems. Information and statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"), nor has the FDA approved the medications to diagnose, cure or prevent disease. Medications compounded by NexGen Pharmaceuticals are prepared at the direction of a veterinarian. NexGen Pharmaceuticals compounded veterinary preparations are not intended for use in food and food-producing animals.
NexGen Pharmaceuticals, LLC does not recommend, endorse or make any representation about the efficacy, appropriateness or suitability of any specific dosing, products, procedures, treatments, services, opinions, veterinary care providers or other information that may be contained in this blog post. NEXGEN PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC IS NOT RESPONSIBLE NOR LIABLE FOR ANY ADVICE, COURSE OF TREATMENT, DIAGNOSIS OR ANY OTHER INFORMATION, SERVICES OR PRODUCTS THAT YOU OBTAIN THROUGH THIS BLOG POST.